How Affordability Relates to Income Inequality and Money in Politics

Affordability has replaced Inflation as the dominant economic narrative. While inflation measures the rate at which prices rise, affordability speaks to whether individuals can sustain their standard of living within the current price environment. As pollster Frank Luntz noted, “Affordability means being able to buy the house you want, the health care you need, and the food and fuel that keep you alive.”

Survey data supports this shift. An Associated Press poll of more than 17,000 Americans found that cost of living concerns surpassed crime, immigration, and other issues as the primary factor motivating voter turnout. The cost of necessities like housing, food, and healthcare are rising much faster than wages for many people.

Thanks for reading Get Money Out Of Politics! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.

Rising income inequality is a major driver of the affordability crisis, as concentrated wealth helps high-income earners outbid others for housing, while stagnant wages for low/middle-income families mean they fall further behind. This is compounded by a fundamental shortage of affordable housing units and issues like restrictive zoning. The rich get richer and the majority get left behind.

The economy is a zero-sum game, where the billionaires get the sum and the rest of us get the zero. There are limited resources in any economy, and the rich are sucking them up, pricing the rest of us out of the market. It hurts our access to affordable housing, healthcare, consumer goods, education, etc. The American dream was stolen by those above us on the economic ladder, not below us.

Experts and average Americans alike believe there’s a strong link, with money in politics fueling rising income inequality by allowing the wealthy to influence policies that favor the rich, such as tax cuts and deregulation. This creates a cycle where economic power translates to political power, further increasing wealth disparities, and undermining democratic responsiveness to the middle and working classes. While other factors contribute (education, technology), the influence of big money is seen as a core driver of policies that exacerbate the gap.

As a result, politicians care more about their donors than their constituents and average Americans are getting zero representation. The rich have a totally different agenda than the rest of us, and that’s why we feel like the country is headed in the wrong direction. The country is being run by billionaires, for billionaires.

Approval ratings for Congress have been < 20% for decades. The presidency see-saws back and forth, where the prevailing sentiment is always “throw the bums out”. We have a two-party system, where roughly 60% of U.S. adults have negative views of both parties. We have a completely corrupt, bribery-based election system.

With billions in campaign contributions, we’re constantly bombarded by negative advertising, which has resulted in hyper-partisanship, essentially poisoning the public square. All any of us wants is a job, family, house and a healthy, secure community to live in. Yet we’ve been manipulated and brainwashed into two warring camps. Neighbor versus neighbor. Towns versus cities. Black versus white versus brown. Chopped into groups by political strategists and advertising executives.

Sadly, most of us don’t realize the real enemy is an elitist Supreme Court, which has been slowly yielding to corporate pressure for 140 years. Corporations can afford to litigate to get what they want over long periods of time. As a result, the meaning of our Constitution has been twisted into a pretzel, where corporations now have human rights and money is the same thing as free speech. Our elections are auctions and billionaires rule.

Congress can’t fix this with legislation. If they write new campaign finance laws, they will be challenged as unconstitutional. The best we can hope for are campaign disclosure laws that would expose the puppet masters pulling the strings.

Another approach that can be used is public matching funds, where a candidate raises small-dollar donations that get matched with public funds. So, at a rate of 8-to-1, a $100 donation becomes $900 for the candidate. But to be constitutional, this approach has to be optional. Another candidate can opt-out and take large donations from anonymous donors. That’s what’s called “dark money”.

Today, most of the election spending comes from corporate organizations such as Super PACs and other dark money corporations. These donors want something in return. The government is working just fine for the rich and badly for the rest of us.

How do we fix this?

If your favorite cause is the environment, education, healthcare, or supporting your favorite candidate, please continue to do so. And thank you for your efforts. But we’ll never accomplish any of our goals with this broken election system. We must fix democracy first. Please spend time and effort on one or more of these essential reforms:

The American Dream is intrinsically linked to a strong, stable middle class, but the middle class is being hollowed out by those at the top of the economic ladder. Income inequality has hit historic, record-high levels and billionaires and gigantic corporations have captured our government.

Just as we did in the late 1800s, during the last Gilded Age, we need to create a Populist/Progressive Alliance. Today’s Democratic Party is controlled by affluent, out-of-touch urbanites who have little in common with regular Americans. Now that the affordability crisis has emerged, we need champions for lower/middle-income families to come forward, partner with Democrats and adopt a populist platform that appeals to a large majority of Americans. Here are the four main planks in the platform:

  • Fix our broken and corrupt election system, as outlined above.
  • Specific policies to address the lack of affordable housing, healthcare, food and energy.
  • A secure border and a reformed immigration policy with a streamlined path to citizenship for people that have been here for many years.
  • Higher taxes on the rich and a turn towards balance budgets

If all this sounds like a Bernie Sanders speech, it should, but with one major difference. If we want to appeal to a broad swath of Americans, we need to stake out moderate positions and messaging. No talk of socialism, free college, free healthcare, etc. Only then can we take back control of our government and make it work for all Americans.

A Democratic Formula for Success

On the 15th Anniversary of Citizens United we need Bernie Sanders type candidates that are moderate — by Jim Crist, Wisconsin United To Amend

I’ve read a lot of articles about why the Democratic Party lost the election.   The list is long and varied:

  • Biden did a poor job controlling the southern border and got saddled with the post pandemic inflation problem.
  • Biden said he’d be a one term president. His selfish arrogance led him to believe he was only person that could defeat Trump.  He robbed his party of an open primary.
  • Biden’s endorsement of Harris robbed the party of a mini-primary.
  • Racism and sexism worked against a black, female candidate from California.

So, what should the Democratic Party do to win back more voters?  The day after the election Bernie Sanders criticized the Democratic Party and its leadership for ignoring working-class voters during the “disastrous” campaign.

“It should come as no great surprise that a Democratic Party, which has abandoned working-class people, would find that the working class has abandoned them,” Sanders said.

“First, it was the working class, and now it is Latino and Black voters as well. While the Democratic leadership defends the status quo, the American people are angry and want change. And they’re right.”

Sanders’ statement is harsh, but he’s not wrong.  Historically, the Democratic Party has been the party for the working class, while the Republican Party is the party for the rich.  For a century, Democrats had been seen as the “party of the people” — the party against powerful special interests and for change.  Now Trump’s populist conservatism has corroded the foundations of the Democratic Party’s appeal.  Populism is defined as a political approach that strives to appeal to ordinary people who feel that their concerns are disregarded by established elite groups.

The Democratic Party needs to emphasize positions that appeal to everyday Americans.  The three top issues according to Gallup polls are:

  1. Economy in general (e.g. jobs, prices, inflation)
  2. Corruption / Money In Politics
  3. Immigration / Border control

These three issues are the only ones with double digit percentages.  Low to mid-single digit issues include abortion, healthcare, crime, climate change, etc.

The other important thing that Dems should do is to deemphasize issues that annoy working people.  The Democratic coalition is primarily made up of folks that are college-educated, liberal, “politically correct” and “woke”.  Many Americans resent being told how to think, speak or act on issues such as racism, discrimination and social justice.

I’m not saying candidates should never say anything about abortion, healthcare, social justice, etc.  But they should spend 80% on the big three and be careful how they speak about cultural changes.

Much has been said about the top issue – the economy, but the number two issue – Corruption / Money In Politics is somehow ignored, like it’s a fact of life that can’t be changed.  As Robert Reich points out in his excellent “America’s four stories” series:

Bernie Sanders told this story about the real Rot at the Top, but other leading Democrats have been reluctant to tell it.

The Democrats’ failure to tell this story has enabled Republican cultural populism to fill the void, offering Americans who were growing distrustful of the system an explanation for what had gone wrong and a set of villains to blame — immigrants, “coastal elites,” “woke”ism, the “deep state,” transgendered people, “communists,” “socialists,” the “Left,” Critical Race Theory, “cat ladies,” and other bogeymen.

But none of these is the real explanation. The real explanation, the real Rot at the Top, has been a new record concentration of wealth and power at the top — enough to corrupt our system of self-government.

Democrats have been reluctant to criticize the monied interests because they depend on big money from corporations and the wealthy.  But all Americans are angry about the money in politics and its associated corruption, and it’s time Democrats speak truth to power.  As David Brooks said after the election in his NYTimes Opinion piece: “The Democratic party has one job: to combat inequality”.

The Citizens United decision has made pandering for big money the norm for both parties.  But the vast majority of wealthy democrats are sick of money in politics, too. There’s a reason many people voted for Bernie in the primaries and Trump in the general election in 2016.

The third top issue is immigration.  Last year, Pew Research published a poll indicating that 80% of Americans thought the U.S. government was doing a bad job handling the migrant influx.  Illegal border crossings soared to record levels under President Biden, averaging two million per year from 2021 to 2023.   No one should be surprised that the Dems lost the election after that.  Biden’s executive order in June that closed the border came three years too late.  People want a controlled border.  But we don’t want family separations and kids in cages.  The Democratic position needs to be both tough and compassionate.  To be clear, discrimination of any kind is unacceptable.

The bottom line is that people are sick of corruption and political dysfunction.  They know that billionaires and mega corporations get whatever they want and the rest of us get no representation whatsoever.  We need Bernie Sanders type candidates that are moderate who will: (1) harp incessantly about money in politics, corruption and inequality, and (2) push for policies that benefit everyday middle-class Americans, and (3) avoid talking about free college, free healthcare or anything that can be construed as woke.

And if you are sick of the money, corruption and political dysfunction, please take action by contacting George at Wisconsin United To Amend.

SJR 121 – urging support for a constitutional amendment

Wisconsinites are tired of the corruptive influence money has on our campaigns and elections.  Elite out-of-state donors, foreign governments, dark money, and special interests are taking away our voices.  A new, bipartisan resolution has just been introduced into the Wisconsin Senate that would help to restore integrity to American elections!  With SJR 121, we can send a clear message that the people of Wisconsin want to allow Congress and States to set reasonable limits on campaign spending.  Tell your WI state representatives to support SJR 121 today!  Legislative sessions are ending soon, so time is of the essence.If you don’t know your legislators, click here — opens new window of map of Wisconsin legislative districts where you enter your address in top right search bar.

———————– Sample text for your message —————————————-

As a constituent of yours, I would very much appreciate it if you would support SJR 121 in this legislative session.

The United States was founded with the guiding principle of being a government of, by, and for the people. We have lost our way. Today, big money, dark money, and even foreign money pours unchecked into our elections and is drowning out the voices of the people.

Please do everything in your power to make sure SJR 121 passes in the 2024 legislative session. This is an urgent matter. We need a constitutional solution that empowers Congress and the States to set reasonable limits on the power of money in our elections.

As your constituent, I would be very proud if you would support this vital legislation. Thank you.

—————————- End Sample Text ————————————————–

Thank you for your patriotism…Let’s Fix This!

14th Anniversary of the Disastrous Citizens United Decision

This is the 14th anniversary of the disastrous Citizens United decision by an elitist Supreme Court, which over the last 135+ years has twisted our Constitution into a pretzel. The word ‘people’ now means corporate Super PACs and the word ‘free speech’ now means billions of dollars in campaign cash.  Billionaires and gigantic corporations get whatever they want, and everyday Americans get nothing…zero representation.

Now we face a dysfunctional government, created by billions of dollars of negative advertising.  Decades of brain washed propaganda.  We’re all angry and divided, separated into polarized tribes. ‘Throw the bums out’ is the common mantra and now we’re dangerously close to throwing out the American Constitution too.

Our problems are not left and right.  It’s up and down.  Our representatives won’t represent us until their campaigns are financed by us.  We must overrule our elitist Supreme Court and end the notion that corporation is a person and that money is the same thing as speech.  Only then can we pass reasonable campaign finance laws that level the playing field.  Only then can We The People work together to solve America’s other major problems.

Wisconsin United to Amend has made great strides over the last 14 years.  Over 840 communities across the U.S. have already passed resolutions calling for a constitutional amendment, including over 170 governments in WI and 22 state legislatures.  Once enough states press Congress on this, they will be forced to act.

We face challenging times, but we remain focused on building the Democracy Movement necessary to restore our Republic.  We’re proud to work with our partners – Wisconsin Democracy CampaignFair MapsFinal Five Voting and other good government groups.

If you can, please help pass a resolution in your community, church or local business.  Or contact your state representatives and ask them to support our resolutions (AJR 92 and SJR 82) that call for a statewide vote on Citizens United.  Just reply to this email and we’ll provide you with all the support you need.  Keep the faith, stay active, talk to your neighbors and together we’ll someday Overturn Citizens United!

Let’s Fix This!

George Penn & Jim Crist (co-chairs)
Wisconsin United To Amend
Building the Movement to Restore our Republic

P.S. And please support our work with a donation. Just click here.

City of Viroqua Votes to Amend the U.S. Constitution

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contact: George Penn, 608-244-6436, georgepenn51@gmail.com

City of Viroqua Votes to Amend the U.S. Constitution

Madison, WI (April 4, 2023) – In the April election, Wisconsin residents in the city of Viroqua in Vernon County voted to amend the U.S. Constitution to clarify that only human beings should have inalienable human rights and money is not the same thing as free speech.

The referendum passed with an overwhelming majority (91%).

That brings the total to 170 Wisconsin communities that have called for an amendment. In total, almost 3.5 million people (61% of Wisconsinites) live in these jurisdictions.  Across the country, 22 state legislatures have voted for an amendment, as well as over 840 towns, villages, cities and counties.

Karen Dahl, a community leader in Viroqua, said “I want to thank the Viroqua City Council for voting 100% of those present to include the resolution on the spring ballot.  And, 91% of the vote in Viroqua tells us that people want to clean up our politics.  We need to amend the constitution to combat corruption, end elite and foreign money control of our elections, and secure representation for all Americans.”

“Over 60% of Wisconsinites have already called for an end to “corporate personhood” and seeing money as a form of speech.”, explained Shawano resident Jan Koch.  “It’s time that our state legislators follow the will of “we the people” and put the referendum on the state ballot.”

Resolutions calling for a statewide vote on Citizens United have been introduced into the state legislature (AJR 78 / SJR 61).  The referendum would ask voters if they support allowing individuals and corporations to spend unlimited amounts of money on political campaigns.

Numerous polls show that government corruption and money in politics is a top issue in America.[1]   Over 90% of Americans, regardless of party, think special interest money has too much influence in American political campaigns.[2]

Jackie Cody, a resident in Rhinelander, explained that: “We need limits on how much money can be contributed and spent on political races.  Only people have a constitutional right to free speech.  Money is not ‘political speech’ under the First Amendment.”

Four in five Americans oppose the Supreme Court’s Citizens United v. FEC decision, according to a Bloomberg poll. A New York Times/CBS poll found that 85 percent of Americans—including majorities of Democrats, Republicans, and Independents—believe we need fundamental changes to our campaign finance system or to completely rebuild it.

Matt Rothschild, executive director of Wisconsin Democracy Campaign, summed it up succinctly: “People across the ideological spectrum get it: All of our voices are being drowned out by those with big money.”

United To Amend is a nonpartisan, all volunteer, citizens group.

For more information visit UnitedToAmend.org

Background material can be obtained here: pdf1, pdf2 and pdf3.

Photos: photo1, photo2, photo3, photo4, photo5, photo6 and photo7.

Link to this press release.

[1] https://wiuta.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Money-In-Politics-Polls.pdf

[2] https://mayday.us/data/20150925_gop_polling_results.pdf

https://mayday.us/data/20150925_dem_polling_results.pdf

http://www.texansunitedtoamend.org/uploads/5/0/8/1/5081028/representus_analysis.pdf

Bartelme Votes to Amend the U.S. Constitution

WIUTA Banner 1340x273

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contact: George Penn, 608-244-6436, georgepenn51@gmail.com

Bartelme Votes to Amend the U.S. Constitution

Madison, WI (November 9, 2022) – In the November election, Wisconsin residents in the town of Bartelme in Shawano County voted to amend the U.S. Constitution to clarify that only human beings should have inalienable human rights and money is not the same thing as free speech.

The referendum passed with an overwhelming majority (88%).

That brings the total to 168 Wisconsin communities that have called for an amendment. In total, almost 3.3 million people (58% of Wisconsinites) live in these jurisdictions.  Across the country, 22 state legislatures have voted for an amendment, as well as over 830 towns, villages, cities and counties.

“Over half of Wisconsinites have already called for an end to “corporate personhood” and seeing money as a form of speech.”, explained Shawano resident Jan Koch.  “It’s time that our state legislators follow the will of “we the people” and put the referendum on the state ballot.  The millions of anonymous dollars spent during this election cycle continue to disenfranchise the average citizens’ voice in American governance.”

“Our politics has become a money game where only the rich and corporate special interests can ante up to play.” exclaimed Bartelme resident Steve Parks.  “And, in the meantime, the rest of us are all left wondering why the needs of everyday citizens aren’t being addressed.”

Resolutions calling for a statewide vote on Citizens United have been introduced into the state legislature (AJR 78 / SJR 61).  The referendum would ask voters if they support allowing individuals and corporations to spend unlimited amounts of money on political campaigns.

Numerous polls show that government corruption and money in politics is a top issue in America.[1]   Over 90% of Americans, regardless of party, think special interest money has too much influence in American political campaigns.[2]

Jackie Cody, a resident in Rhinelander, explained that: “We need limits on how much money can be contributed and spent on political races.  Only people have a constitutional right to free speech.  Money is not ‘political speech’ under the First Amendment.”

Four in five Americans oppose the Supreme Court’s Citizens United v. FEC decision, according to a Bloomberg poll. A New York Times/CBS poll found that 85 percent of Americans—including majorities of Democrats, Republicans, and Independents—believe we need fundamental changes to our campaign finance system or to completely rebuild it.

Matt Rothschild, executive director of Wisconsin Democracy Campaign, summed it up succinctly: “People across the ideological spectrum get it: All of our voices are being drowned out by those with big money.”

United To Amend is a nonpartisan, all volunteer, citizens group.

For more information visit UnitedToAmend.org

Background material can be obtained here: pdf1, pdf2 and pdf3.

Photos: photo1, photo2, photo3, photo4, photo5, photo6 and photo7.

Link to this press release.

[1] https://wiuta.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Money-In-Politics-Polls.pdf

[2] https://mayday.us/data/20150925_gop_polling_results.pdf

https://mayday.us/data/20150925_dem_polling_results.pdf

http://www.texansunitedtoamend.org/uploads/5/0/8/1/5081028/representus_analysis.pdf

America’s Core Problem…Money in Politics

by Jim Crist, Wisconsin United to Amend

There is no shortage of problems in America.  If you’re focused on fixing any one of those problems, thank you!  And yes, there are deep rooted social issues such as racism and other forms of discrimination, plus religious intolerance that won’t be fixed by limiting Money in Politics.  But if we had a functioning democracy, we could better address those social issues.  Sadly, Money in Politics is a difficult problem to fix because the U.S. Supreme Court is elitist and pro-corporation.

  • The Supreme Court has given constitutional rights meant only for individuals to artificial entities such as corporations, unions and nonprofits such as Super PACs. This gives corporations constitutional advantages over the American people, since corporations have a lot of money and never die.
  • Corporations can afford to continually bring cases to SCOTUS until they get what they want.
  • Supreme Court Justices generally have privileged backgrounds and an ivy league education.

Billions are spent buying politicians via donations and Super PACs.  This is nothing more than bribery.

  • Billions of dollars are spent on negative attack ads that spew misinformation which divide Americans.
  • Politicians prioritize campaign cash over doing what’s good for their constituents.

Billionaires and Corporate Special Interests have a very different agenda which results in bad policy for Americans:

  • Billionaires and Corporate Special Interests control our tax laws resulting in historic wealth inequality.  Mega corporations can eliminate their competition and are exploiting the middle and lower classes.  Everyday Americans can’t get ahead anymore and they’re frustrated and angry.
  • Gun manufactures and the NRA owns the GOP and now there are more guns than Americans, resulting in almost daily mass shootings.
  • Healthcare companies own plenty of politicians and America’s healthcare costs are twice as much as  any other country.
  • The Koch Brothers were pioneers in buying influence which fueled climate change deniers for decades and hurts our transition to clean energy.
  • The Military Industrial Complex owns enough politicians to make sure America spends more on defense than the next 9 largest countries combined.
  • Deregulation results in environmental degradation, toxic pollution, healthcare problems and climate disasters.
  • Public schools are failing because families are stressed and disillusioned about the future.  It all comes back to inequality.  Inequality brought on by money in politics.
  • College is so expensive because of the lack of state funding, because colleges aren’t bribing enough politicians.

All this results in a populace that is divided, misinformed, frustrated, angry, blaming government corruption and the other party for all their problems.  It’s all related to our corrupt campaign finance system, compliments of our Supreme Court.

Solutions:

  • Make voting both easy and secure.
  • Disclosure requirements on Political Spending (no more dark money).
  • Adopt election systems with non-partisan primaries and ranked choice voting.  This encourages moderation and discourages partisanship.
  • Eliminate gerrymandering by adopting nonpartisan districting.
  • Public financing for candidates (stopgap solution, since big buck candidates can opt out).
  • Overhaul Lobbying and Ethics laws.
  • Amend the Constitution to clarify that only people are people and money isn’t the same thing as speech.
  • Change our system of representation to encourage majority rule and discourage rule by a radical minority.

Get Involved. Get Active…Let’s Fix This!

Red Springs Votes to Amend the U.S. Constitution

WIUTA Banner 1340x273

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contact: George Penn, 608-244-6436, georgepenn51@gmail.com

Red Springs Votes to Amend the U.S. Constitution

Madison, WI (April 6, 2022) – In the Spring election, Wisconsin residents in the Town of Red Springs voted to amend the U.S. Constitution to clarify that only human beings should have inalienable human rights and money is not the same thing as free speech.

The referendum passed with an 89% majority in Red Springs, which is in Shawano County.

That brings the total to 167 Wisconsin communities that have called for an amendment. In total, almost 3.3 million people (58% of Wisconsinites) live in these jurisdictions.  Across the country, 22 state legislatures have voted for an amendment, as well as over 830 towns, villages, cities and counties.

“Over half of Wisconsinites have already called for an end to “corporate personhood” and seeing money as a form of speech.”, explained Red Springs resident Deanna Bisley.  “It’s time that our state legislators follow the will of “we the people” and put the referendum on the state ballot.  The millions of dark money dollars spent during recent election cycles continues to disenfranchise everyday Americans.”

“The Citizen’s United decision has been a disaster since day one.  We used to worry about old fashioned PACs!”, exclaimed Shawano resident, Jan Koch.  “Even their voices are not heard since the explosion of Super PACs.  The voice of the people will be gone until our Constitution is amended to correct this travesty.”

Resolutions calling for a statewide vote on Citizens United have been introduced into the state legislature (AJR 78 / SJR 61).  The referendum would ask voters if they support allowing individuals and corporations to spend unlimited amounts of money on political campaigns.

Numerous polls show that government corruption and money in politics is a top issue in America.[1]   Over 90% of Americans, regardless of party, think special interest money has too much influence in American political campaigns.

Jackie Cody, a resident in Rhinelander, explained that: “We need limits on how much money can be contributed and spent on political races.  Only people have a constitutional right to free speech.  Money is not ‘political speech’ under the First Amendment.”

Four in five Americans oppose the Supreme Court’s Citizens United v. FEC decision, according to a Bloomberg poll[2]. A New York Times/CBS poll[3] found that 85 percent of Americans—including majorities of Democrats, Republicans, and Independents—believe we need fundamental changes to our campaign finance system or to completely rebuild it.

Matt Rothschild, executive director of Wisconsin Democracy Campaign, summed it up succinctly: “People across the ideological spectrum get it: All of our voices are being drowned out by those with big money.”

United To Amend is a cross-partisan, all volunteer, citizens group.

For more information visit UnitedToAmend.org

Background material can be obtained here: pdf1, pdf2 and pdf3.

Photos: photo1, photo2, photo3, photo4, photo5, photo6 and photo7.

[1] https://wiuta.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Money-In-Politics-Polls.pdf

[2] https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-09-28/bloomberg-poll-americans-want-supreme-court-to-turn-off-political-spending-spigot

[3] https://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/03/us/politics/poll-shows-americans-favor-overhaul-of-campaign-financing.html

“For the People Act” Explained

You’ve probably heard something about the “Voting rights bill” that the Democrats passed in the House. The Senate is about to take it up.  What’s in it and what are some of the myths that are now being leveled against it?

The bill that the House passed is H.R.1For the People Act”.  It passed along strict party lines.  In the Senate it is called S.1 and it’ll be taken up in committee this Wednesday, March 24th.

It’s much more than a voting rights bill.  It’s a desperately needed democracy reform billVox.com compiled an excellent description of what’s in the bill, so rather than paraphrase, here is an excerpt:

Voting rights

  • Creates new national automatic voter registration that asks voters to opt out rather than opt in, ensuring more people will be signed up to vote. Requires chief state election officials to automatically register eligible unregistered citizens.
  • Requires each state to put online options for voter registration, correction, cancellation, or designating party affiliation.
  • Requires at least 15 consecutive days of early voting for federal elections; early voting sites would be open for at least 10 hours per day. The bill also prohibits states from restricting a person’s ability to vote by mail, and requires states to prepay postage on return envelopes for mail-in voting.
  • Establish independent redistricting commissions in states as a way to draw new congressional districts and end partisan gerrymandering in federal elections.
  • Prohibits voter roll purging and bans the use of non-forwardable mail being used as a way to remove voters from rolls.
  • Restores voting rights to people convicted of felonies who have completed their sentences; however, the bill doesn’t restore rights to felons currently serving sentences in a correctional facility.

Campaign finance

  • Establishes public financing of campaigns, powered by small donations. This has long been Sarbanes’s vision:  The federal government would provide a voluntary 6-1 match for candidates for president and Congress, which means for every dollar a candidate raises from small donations, the federal government would match it six times over. The maximum small donation that could be matched would be capped at $200.  This program isn’t funded by taxpayer dollars; instead, the money would come from adding a 4.75 percent fee on criminal and civil fines, fees, penalties, or settlements with banks and corporations that commit corporate malfeasance (think Wells Fargo).
  • Supports a constitutional amendment to end Citizens United.  (requires a separate resolution).
  • Passes the DISCLOSE Act, pushed by Rep. David Cicilline and Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, both Democrats from Rhode Island.  This would require super PACs and “dark money” political organizations to make their donors public.
  • Passes the Honest Ads Act, championed by Sens. Klobuchar and Mark Warner (VA), which would require Facebook and Twitter to disclose the source of money for political ads on their platforms and share how much money was spent.  (A Facebook spokesman told Vox the company has publicly supported Honest Ads Act since 2018).
  • Discloses any political spending by government contractors and slows the flow of foreign money into the elections by targeting shell companies.
  • Restructures the Federal Election Commission to have five commissioners instead of six, in order to break political gridlock at the organization.
  • Prohibits any coordination between candidates and super PACs.

Ethics

  • Requires the president and vice president to disclose 10 years of his or her tax returns. Candidates for president and vice president must also do the same.
  • Stops members of Congress from using taxpayer money to settle sexual harassment or discrimination cases.
  • Gives the Office of Government Ethics the power to do more oversight and enforcement and implement stricter lobbying registration requirements. These include more oversight of foreign agents by the Foreign Agents Registration Act.
  • Creates a new ethics code for the US Supreme Court, ensuring all branches of government are impacted by the new law.

Clearly, this is a pro-democracy bill that makes it easier for U.S. citizens to get registered and vote, ends partisan gerrymandering, promotes small donor campaign financing and ends “dark money” by promptly disclosing donations over $10,000.

Sadly, republican lawmakers in 43 states have introduced 253 bills to restrict ballot access, citing the need to assure Americans that elections will no longer be “rigged” — despite the lack of evidence of widespread fraud in 2020.

So, republicans are eager to disparage and mischaracterize what’s in the bill. Here are some of their falsehoods:

  • It uses your tax dollars to support candidates you don’t support. No, it uses criminal and civil fines and settlements with corporations that commit malfeasance.
  • This is a democratic power grab that is anti-republican. Well, yes, it pushes back against GOP voter suppression laws.  Sadly, the GOP is increasingly a minority rule party pushing an agenda dictated by its rich donors in addition to other constituencies: gun enthusiasts, anti-abortion folks and white nationalists.
  • It’s an unconstitutional overreach of states’ rights. This set national standards for registration and voting.  There are national standards for lots of things, and this is necessary to push back against current voter suppression tactics. Article I, Section 4 of the Constitution gives the Congress the power “at any time” to “make or alter” state election regulations.
  • Same day voter registration invites fraud. More than twenty states already have same day registration. Proof of identity and residence are required and there are criminal penalties for fraudulent voting.  Cases of fraud are far and few between.

Republicans in the Senate would happily use the filibuster rule to kill the For the People Act. Democrats call it necessary democracy reform and they can change or eliminate the filibuster rule with a simple majority.  As majority leader, Chuck Schumer said: “Everything is on the table. Failure is not an option.”

Wisconsin United To Amend supports this major democracy reform bill and hopes you will too.  Please educate your family and friends about it and hopefully together we can see it through.  It represents an important step towards our goal of a Constitutional Amendment that would once again allow states and Congress to set legislative limits on campaign spending.

Two More Communities Vote to Amend the U.S. Constitution

WIUTA Banner 1340x273

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contact: George Penn, 608-244-6436, georgepenn51@gmail.com

Two More Communities Vote to Amend the U.S. Constitution

Madison, WI (November 5, 2020) – In the November election, Wisconsin residents in two communities voted to amend the U.S. Constitution to clarify that only human beings should have inalienable human rights and money is not the same thing as free speech.

The referenda passed with overwhelming majorities in both Winnebago County (76%) and the town of Land O’ Lakes in Vilas County (84%).

That brings the total to 166 Wisconsin communities that have called for an amendment. In total, almost 3.3 million people (58% of Wisconsinites) live in these jurisdictions.  Across the country, 20 state legislatures have voted for an amendment, as well as over 830 towns, villages, cities and counties.

“Over half of Wisconsinites have already called for an end to “corporate personhood” and seeing money as a form of speech.”, explained Oshkosh resident Cheryl Hansen.  “It’s time that our state legislators follow the will of “we the people” and put the referendum on the state ballot.  The millions of anonymous dollars spent during this election cycle continue to disenfranchise the average citizens’ voice in American governance.”

“The Citizen’s United decision has been a disaster since day one.  We used to worry about old fashioned PACs!”, exclaimed Minocqua resident, Kay Hoff.  “Even their voices are not heard since the explosion of Super PACs.  The voice of the people will be gone until our Constitution is amended to correct this travesty.”

Resolutions calling for a statewide vote on Citizens United have been introduced into the state legislature (AJR 11 / SJR 9).  The referendum would ask voters if they support allowing individuals and corporations to spend unlimited amounts of money on political campaigns.

Numerous polls show that government corruption and money in politics is a top issue in America.[1] Over 90% of Americans, regardless of party, think special interest money has too much influence in American political campaigns.[2]

Jackie Cody, a resident in Rhinelander, explained that: “We need limits on how much money can be contributed and spent on political races.  Only people have a constitutional right to free speech.  Money is not ‘political speech’ under the First Amendment.”

Four in five Americans oppose the Supreme Court’s Citizens United v. FEC decision, according to a Bloomberg poll. A New York Times/CBS poll found that 85 percent of Americans—including majorities of Democrats, Republicans, and Independents—believe we need fundamental changes to our campaign finance system or to completely rebuild it.

Matt Rothschild, executive director of Wisconsin Democracy Campaign, summed it up succinctly: “People across the ideological spectrum get it: All of our voices are being drowned out by those with big money.”

United To Amend is a nonpartisan, all volunteer, citizens group.

For more information visit UnitedToAmend.org

Background material can be obtained here: pdf1, pdf2 and pdf3.

Photos: photo1, photo2, photo3, photo4, photo5, photo6 and photo7.

[1] https://wiuta.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Money-In-Politics-Polls.pdf

[2] https://mayday.us/data/20150925_gop_polling_results.pdf

https://mayday.us/data/20150925_dem_polling_results.pdf

http://www.texansunitedtoamend.org/uploads/5/0/8/1/5081028/representus_analysis.pdf

1 2 3 6